Join and meet exercises
Try these exercises to test your knowledge of joins and meets.
Tangled up
Determine whether or not the following joins and meets exist in the poset depicted by the above Hasse diagram.
Show solution
This join does not exist, because and are incomparable upper bounds of , and no smaller upper bounds of exist.
Show solution
This join exists. .
Show solution
This meet does not exist, because and are incomparable lower bounds of , and no larger lower bounds of exist.
Show solution
This join exists. It is \( l \).
Join fu
Let be a poset, , and . Prove that if both and exist then exists as well, and .
Show solution
For any \(X \subset P\), let \(X^U\) denote the set of upper bounds of \(X\). The above proposition follows from the fact that \(\{\bigvee S, p\}^U = (S \cup p)^U\), which is apparent from the following chain of bi-implications:
\(q \in \{\bigvee S, p\}^U \iff \)
(for all \(s \in S, q \geq \bigvee S \geq s\) and \(q \geq p) \iff\)
\(q \in (S \cup \{p\})^U\).
If two subsets of a poset have the same set of upper bounds, then either they both lack a least upper bound, or both have the same least upper bound.
Meet fu
Let be a poset, , and . Prove that if both and exist then exists as well, and .
Show solution
Note that the proposition we are trying to prove here is the dual of the one stated in join fu. Thanks to the duality principle, this theorem therefore comes for free with our solution to join fu.
Quite a big join
In the poset discussed in poset examples, does exist? If so, what is it?